Ito Jakuchu and the eccentrics of 18th century Kyoto

The Edo period of Japanese history (1603-1868) showed an extraordinary flourishing of visual art. While the official Kano and Tosa painting schools (of the shogun and the imperial court, respectively), settled into producing formulaic screens and scrolls for the samurai and noble elite, the new wealth and self-confidence of the merchant class encouraged the emergence of popular and experimental art forms, perhaps the most famous in the West being the brightly coloured compositions of ukiyo-e prints. The dazzling views of Mount Fuji or Edo, or the startling prints of kabuki actors or beautiful women created by Hokusai, Hiroshige, Kuniyoshi and other famous names were part of a new visual language which celebrated the bustling, commercial world of the Edo-period mercantile class.kuniyoshi_utagawa2c_at_the_shore_of_the_sumida_river

Meanwhile in Kyoto, a handful of virtuoso artists began to push the limits of artistic norms and, moreover, embodied their artistic philosophy in their daily lives and behaviour. These were the ‘bunjin’ (文人), commonly translated as ‘literati’. Later scholars describe a flourishing of ‘literati consciousness’ centred on Kyoto, a city of powerful Buddhist institutions and a shadowy imperial presence. Artists such as Ikeno Taiga (1723-1776) and Yosa Buson (1716-1783) were inspired by the influx of Chinese art and painting manuals imported through the recently-founded Chinese Zen temple of Mampukuji, a simulacrum of late-Ming Chinese culture located just outside Kyoto. Priding themselves on their deep learning of ancient Chinese culture and skills in the four arts of painting, poetry, calligraphy and music, bunjin sought to replicate the scholarly, leisurely lives of the fabled Chinese wenrenhua scholar-bureaucrats of the Southern Song dynasty (1127-1279). In their painting, bunjin expressed a philosophy in which a landscape was a self-portrait: what mattered was not a realistic depiction of the place, but that the artist can express his own emotions and spirit through the work. The dazzling patterns of Ikeno Taiga’s landscapes attest to this philosophy. For most of his life, Taiga lived his ideal of residing in a humble tea-house in Kyoto with his wife, Gyokuran (an accomplished artist in her own right), practicing traditional arts, welcoming passers-by and occasionally going off on spontaneous hikes up mountains.ikeno_taiga_1723-1776_hanging_scroll_e28093_landscape_with_pavilion-_after_1750

Bunjin looked back to 12th-13th century Chinese tradition, but the later emergence of artists labelled kijin (‘eccentrics’, 畸人) looked back even further, to the distant past of reclusive Daoist sages and wizards (sennin 仙人). The kijin philosophy was embodied by the three artists Soga Shohaku (1730-1781), Nagasawa Rosetsu (1754-1799) and Ito Jakuchu (1716-1800) who in their lives and paintings expressed a studied disregard for social and artistic conventions. Soga Shohaku, for example, was widely regarded as insane, but showed virtuosic talent with his wild, demoniac paintings.7 Nagasawa Rosetsu famously pranked his eminent master, the painter Maruyama Okyo (1733-1795), by giving him a painting to critique, listening to the scathing judgement, before revealing that it was in fact his master’s own, leading to his expulsion from the studio. In contrast to this ostentatious behaviour, Ito Jakuchu embodied an ‘eremitic eccentrism’, derived from the story that he had received no formal training (a myth), his sudden appearance on the art scene, and his very reclusive, monastic lifestyle.

Ito Jakuchu was able to transcend artistic standards through his technical precision and obsessive attention to detail. His brightly coloured depictions of insects, birds, fish, plants and animals are known for such a high level of realism that botanists have identified the gender of the plants, and occasionally it is even possible to tell the time of day when he faithfully observed and depicted them. Composed according to an intricate grid pattern inspired by textile-makers in his Kyoto district of Nishiki-Koji, Jakuchu’s roosters, cockatoos, hawks and other diverse members of the animal kingdom sit proudly staring back at the viewer through mysterious, perfectly circular, dark eyes.ito-jakuchu-6-4-12-13

One of Jakuchu’s more puzzling works is his monochrome Vegetable Parinirvana.vegnir

Paintings depicting the death and ultimate enlightenment of the Buddha had a long tradition in Japanese Buddhist painting and follow a set structure, with the Buddha reclining in the centre under the Sala trees and surrounded by mourners. Jakuchu reproduced this structure, but replaced the figures with over sixty ordinary, household vegetables such as turnips, mushrooms, pumpkins and eggplants, and a large daikon (radish) in the centre to represent the Buddha. This was not satire or comedy, however. In East Asia, radishes were often a symbol of the frugal, rigorous monastic life and since the mid-fifteenth century appeared as a motif in ink paintings such as The Radish and The Vegetable by the venerable Chinese Southern Sung painter Mu-ch’i Fa-ch’ang (now in the Imperial Household Collection). The humble vegetable and its depictions were admired among tea aesthetes for its humility and roughness. There are also theories that the vegetables in Jakuchu’s painting commemorate the end of the Jakuchu family greengrocer business, run by his brother who had recently died.

In fact, Jakuchu’s purpose in his paintings is often unclear and left to speculation. This is also the case with his epic screen paintings Elephant and Whale, which show the two masters of land and sea triumphantly calling to each other, and is a virtuosic masterpiece, but leaves scholars somewhat baffled as to its meaning.144242a7aebbc377dfe85b6165288750 Most striking of all to modern eyes, perhaps, is White Elephant and Other Beasts, in which Jakuchu divided the paper surface into six thousand small squares as if it were an experiment in modern expressionism. dlineimgl1_5

Meanwhile, his idiosyncratic depictions of Daoist sages such as Kanzan and Jittoku summarise the nonconformist, Daoist ideals underpinning the kijin lifestyle. Daoist texts such as the Zhuangzi (3rd century BC) celebrated the reclusive life of eccentric sages, madmen who eschew social conventions and thus have access to deeper, more profound sources of wisdom and knowledge.

kanzan_and_jittoku_by_ito_jakuchu_c-_1763_museum_of_east_asian_art_cologne

As with bunjin, the phenomenon of kijin can be seen to emerge from counter-hegemonic pressures seeking to reaffirm the value of the individual in restrictive Tokugawa society. They were the result of the rising anxieties of mercantile capitalism, the weakening of the bakufu’s authority, and the rediscovery of individuality and Selfhood in both intellectual and artistic circles. As for their ‘madness’ and ‘insanity’, it can be noted that, in the words of Foucault, “where there is a work of art, there is no madness”: art cannot coexist with true, chaotic madness, since it would be unable to create significant meaning. The eccentrics of Tokugawa Japan were eccentrics only within certain boundaries deemed acceptable by society. We should also reflect that, whether coming from a Western or an East Asian tradition, eccentrics drew admiration because they were seen to have access to other forms of knowledge and truth. In addition to profound societal changes, the Confucian intellectual circles of Tokugawa Japan also witnessed a radical shifting of positions regarding truth, reason, morality and the Self, and this had profound implications across society. Such intellectual and social developments were the backdrop to the exploring of new sources of truth, wisdom and beauty inherent in the adoption of new identities such as bunjin (literati) and kijin.

Daitokuji Temple, Kyoto

Daitokuji 大徳寺 ‘Temple of Great Virtue’

Described by the writer Jon Carter Covell as ‘the most important Zen temple in Japan’, the distinguished temple complex of Daitokuji in Northern Kyoto has often been at the centre of Japan’s cultural, artistic, religious and political history.

However, for the first almost two centuries of its existence, it struggled for its survival. Established in the early 14th Century by the esteemed Zen master Myōchō Shūhō (Daito Kokushi, 1282-1338), it survived decades of relative financial austerity and political instability to eventually recover and find prosperity from the late 15th Century. Acquiring fame also as a centre for tea ceremony, Daitokuji retains its reputation today for its architecture, meticulous gardens and precious collection of artistic and cultural treasures.

Daitokuji today is one of 15 headquarters of the Rinzai sect of Zen Buddhism. Although far surpassed in institutional terms by its main Kyoto rival, Myoshinji, it still has a considerable nationwide organisation of two active monasteries, 200 branch temples, and over 50,000 adherents. It possesses 24 subtemples and an additional 44 subsidiary buildings across its 57 acres of land in Northern Kyoto, an area formerly known as the Murasakino (‘Purple Fields’).

People

Myocho Shuho (1282-1338)

Better known by his honorific name, Daitō Kokushi (‘National Teacher Daitō’). As an up-and-coming Zen master untainted by links to the authoritarian Hōjō clan in Kamakura, Daito managed to gather enough support and patronage for the construction of a new temple in Northeast Kyoto, what would become Daitokuji, and would serve as its first abbot.

Praised in typical fashion by the famous 18th Century Zen master Hakuin Ekaku as “Japan’s most poisonous flower”, Daito gained fame for allegedly spending twenty years living under the Gojo bridge in Kyoto among beggars as part of his spiritual training. A famous story has it that an emperor, seeking him out among the beggars and aware of his fondness for a type of melon, handed each beggar a melon to see in their eyes who was most excited. With Daitō having revealed himself, as a philosophical test the emperor told him to receive the melon without using his hands, to which Daitō responded, “give it to me without using yours”.

Daito can be regarded as a historical figure who attempted to balance the rigorous, individualistic life of a Zen disciple with the demands of being the founder of an institution. In the period between his move to Murasakino in 1319 and his death in 1337, he only travelled on two occasions, preferring to stay in Daitokuji and concentrate on his work there. Such permanent residence was quite unusual for a prominent Zen master, but he seemed to take virtue from it. After his trip to Kyushu he composed the poem:

“No footprints of mine are seen

wherever I wander;

on a tip of a hair I left the capital

on three drum taps I am leaving Kyushu”

Most, if not all, of today’s Rinzai monks consider themselves Daitō’s spiritual descendants. Monks today still come to Daitokuji to train according to his strict rules, and his ‘Final Admonitions’ are chanted daily in monasteries across the country. Furthermore, as a native Japanese trained in Japan as opposed to China, he was one of the pioneers of a period in which Zen was becoming more distinctly Japanese. Daitokuji was indeed significant for being the first major monastery in Japan founded by a native Japanese who had never travelled to China.

Tetto Giko (1295-1369)

Daito’s appointed successor as abbot of Daitokuji, Tetto Giko was an able administrator and abbot for 31 years. He stabilised Daitokuji’s sources of patronage during the precarious political situation of the 14th century, and managed to add a Buddha hall and the first sub-temple, Tokuzenji to Daitokuji’s architecture. Like Daito, Tetto was known for being an often strict and intense teacher, once threatening to cut off his own tongue if someone did not experience kenshou (‘initial awakening’) during a 90 day training session. Fortunately, a pupil, Gongai Sochu (1315-1390) did manage to achieve this, and indeed Gongai became Tetto’s primary successor at Daitokuji.

Fortunately for historians, Tetto was also a meticulous record collector. In 1368 he evaluated the size of Daitokuji as having around 200 monks, confirming that it remained relatively small several decades after its founding.

Ikkyū Sōjun (1394-1481)

The famous Ikkyū was an eccentric calligrapher, poet, and often vagabond known in popular culture (through an animated children’s TV series) as a mischievous hero. His connection with Daitokuji began in earnest when he saved Daitō’s calligraphy from fire during the Ōnin war (1467-1477). Subsequently, in 1474 he was designated abbot, a role which, given his bizarre character, he was perhaps reluctant to take on.

Plenty has already been written about Ikkyū. Suffice to say he lived at a time coinciding with Daitokuji beginning to find some fortune and prosperity. Ikkyū himself brought links with rich merchants in Sakai, associations with poets, the tea ceremony and the imperial family, and guided Daitokuji on the path to becoming an artistic and cultural hub.

Sen no Rikyu (1522-1591)

An even more famous name to be linked to Daitokuji, Sen no Rikyu is globally renowned as the master of chanoyu tea ceremony. Rikyu underwent Zen training at Daitokuji and his grave can be visited at the sub-temple Jukoin, where a ceremony is held by tea ceremony schools every month.

Daitokuji retains strong associations with Rikyu as the setting for the drama which led to his death. Rikyu reconstructed the impressive, vermilion Sanmon (main gate) in 1589 and placed a statue of himself inside on the second storey. His master, the volatile shogun Toyotomi Hideyoshi (1536-1598), was furious at the implication that he may have to walk beneath a statue of his tea master to enter the temple. It has been supposed that this was the reason Hideyoshi ordered Rikyu to commit ritual suicide in 1591. The statue itself was ceremonially ‘crucified’.

OTHERS:

Takuan Soho (1573-1645) – made 154th abbot of Daitokuji in 1608, Takuan was one of the most famous Zen masters of his time. He was prolific in his writing and artistic endeavours, and many people interested in Zen today come to know him through his work, The Unfettered Mind. He was particularly known for drawing on the art of swordsmanship and fusing it with Zen ritual.

Kobori Enshū (1579-1647) – a famous aristocrat and tea master associated with the temple, who designed the Bosen-seki teahouse in Daitokuji’s sub-temple Koho-an. His style of tea ceremony has been labelled ‘Enshū-ryū’.

Kogetsu Sogan (1574-1643)

Son of Daitokuji’s abbot Tsuda Sogyu, Kogetsu became a leading Daitokuji monk, tea master and colleague of Kobori Enshu. Kogetsu’s achievements are an example of how Daitokuji cultivated the arts in the Zen Buddhist world. Best known as a peerless connoisseur of calligraphy, he left behind ‘Bokuseki no utsushi’ (Copies of Ink Traces), a record of calligraphy produced by Zen monks from 1611-43. A chronicle in the Chinese genre of ‘things seen and heard’, his work is frank about commercial interests in the early 17th century art world in Kyoto. It reveals disputes over the authenticity of works and the high value placed on Bokuseki calligraphy as an object for the tea ceremony.

Timeline of significant events

1319 Zen master Daito moves to the Murasakino area of Northern Kyoto, merely a sparsely populated area of rice paddies, forests and wild marshes.

1325-26 Dharma hall (hatto) constructed, marking the beginnings of Daitokuji as a temple. According to Chinese Sung Dynasty precedent, all monks used to assemble there every morning and night to listen to Daito’s speech and the subsequent question and answer between monks and Daito.

1326 A solemn inauguration ceremony for the Dharma hall and the temple as a whole. This was a public demonstration of the sources of sponsorship and support Daito had managed to gather to build Daitokuji.

According to sources, there was a solemn procession from the gate to the new Dharma hall, led by Daito who was wearing bright red Chinese slippers curled upwards. Traditionally the abbot then engages in an impromptu ‘Dharma combat’ question and answer session with the congregation. On this occasion, though, it was ceremonial and much deference was shown towards Daito. Overall, the ceremony was quite conventional in taste, following standard Chinese Buddhist formulae such as the line in Daito’s speech ‘I pray that the emperor will live for tens of thousands of years’. Most likely, this was because the two emperors present were his most powerful patrons.

1333 Emperor Go-Daigo confirms the Kyoto precincts of Daitokuji consisting of a generous twelve acres (today Daitokuji has more than 57 acres), but with only two main buildings, the hatto and the recently donated abbot’s residence. Daito forbade the building of a separate memorial hall for himself after his death. Instead, he was remembered with just a memorial alcove within the abbot’s residence, the Unmon-an, which can be visited today. Daitokuji was still a relatively humble temple at this stage.

14th – mid-15th Century

After its initial founding, Daitokuji endures a century of relative austerity. In its first decades, Daitokuji was subject to the turbulent political transition from the Kamakura to Muromachi periods, and was at various times elevated or ignored in the all-important ‘Gozan’ ranking system of Zen temples. Its status changed according to the political will of the main political actors, including the two emperors, the reigning Go-Daigo and the former emperor Hanazono. Indeed, Daitokuji’s patronage was split between these two powerful figures. Daitokuji’s lands were also vulnerable to confiscation by the Ashikaga shoguns and partisans, particularly after the defeat of emperor Go-Daigo with whom the temple was associated.

1426

The Daitokuji monk Shunsaku Zenko compiles the first biography of Daito. Daito has always retained his status as a revered Zen master. In fact, on the 22nd day of each month, the current abbots of all 24 sub-temples assemble for a memorial service in honour of Daito and place flowers, green tea and other offerings before a life-size wooden effigy of him. In November every year, this ceremony is performed publicly in the Dharma hall. A representative of imperial family is invited, along with prominent tea masters, dozens of abbots from other temples and all the monks of Daitokuji and Myoshinji. Every 50 years there is an even larger ceremony, which in May 1983 attracted 3000 guests. Emperor Showa himself sent a personal donation, in honour of the links between the temple and the imperial family.

Mid-16th century Most of Daitokuji’s architecture is destroyed by fire.

1582

Oda Nobunaga’s funeral held at Daitokuji, overseen by Toyotomi Hideyoshi. Hideyoshi then built Nobunaga a mortuary sub-temple, Soken-in. Daitokuji was lavishly patronised by Hideyoshi, who regularly participated in tea ceremonies there.

1629

Daitokuji plays a prominent role during the Purple Robe Incident. Many Daitokuji abbots become rare symbols of political protest.

1635 Abbot’s quarters (hojo) completed.

1661-1673

(Kanbun era) Daitokuji reaches the peak of its prosperity. The main temple and its 24 sub-temples were architecturally distinguished with gates, halls and meticulous gardens. The temple had by now accumulated many profoundly important paintings, ceramics, tea utensils, altar figures, screens and calligraphic scrolls. Its Zen gardens are pinnacles of the genre, and its tea rooms are considered the centre for chanoyu tea ceremony.

Modern era – Daitokuji’s impact on the Western understanding of Zen Buddhism

1950s and 60s – Daitokuji opens itself to American students coming to study Zen, eventually having an influence on the American arts and culture of that generation. Those who came to train in Zen and reside at Daitokuji include the Beat-associated poet Gary Snyder and the poet-filmmaker Ruth Stephan.

1958 Ruth Fuller Sasaki renovates the subtemple Ryosen’an and converts it to house the first Zen Institute of America in Japan.

1970s and 80s – Abbot Kobori Nanrei Sohaku, a disciple of Daisetsu Suzuki, mentors many American students and holds zazen sessions in the Ryokoin. Among his students is James H. Austin, neurologist and author of Zen and the Brain.

Features

As mentioned, Daitokuji is famous for the treasures in its collections. Indeed, it has one of the most important monastic treasuries in the country. The temple has held kaichou or mushiboshi since the Edo period. These are regular viewings of the temple’s treasures, open to the public. Originally held in the seventh lunar month to expose treasures and paintings to air and sunlight, slowing mould and insect damage, by the 18th Century these had become carnival-like events.

There are many treasures to be found among its grounds and subtemples. The Jukoin subtemple, famous for the grave of Sen no Rikyu, also houses works by the eminent Kano-school master Kano Eitoku (1543-1590). Elsewhere, there are sliding door paintings and scrolls by the most famous Edo-period Kano academy artist, Kano Tan’yu. Daitokuji is also well-known for possessing rare 13th century hanging scrolls by the Chinese master Muqi (National Treasures). Equally unusual is a Go (Chinese board game) board once used by both Toyotomi Hideyoshi and the eventual unifier of the country, Tokugawa Ieyasu.

Regarding the architecture, one of the highlights is the Sanmon main gate, the southern end of the temple’s overall north-south axis. However, more than simply an attraction for the tourist, this gate, with its eventful history, can help us reflect on our interpretations of Daitokuji. Looking at the temple from a more holistic approach and challenging existing art historical discourse surrounding the temple, historian Gregory Levine discusses the gate in the context of how Daitokuji has been perceived, particularly in Western scholarship. The main features of the gate are typical of a ‘zen-style’, consisting of slender pillars, clustered brackets, and ornamentally carved components. Usually Daitokuji is seen in this way: through a rhetoric of cultural particularism as an archetypal ‘Zen’ temple.

However, as this gate shows, Daitokuji was also designed to accommodate mainstream Buddhism, and fulfilled the needs of any large temple community. The Sanmon gate was a venue for transmission rites, and this is shown in particular by a sculptural ensemble on second floor. This ensemble consists of Sixteen Rakan sculptures, and paintings of dragons, celestial beings and guardians by the eminent painter Hasegawa Tohaku. Breaking away from any characterisation of Zen temples as timeless, transcendental spaces, Levine emphasises the gate as a venue for rites and rituals, the site of communal identity, and a ‘gate of memory’.

As a centre for tea ceremony and particular object of attention for Westerners, from Ernest Fenellosa to Beat poets, perhaps Daitokuji is particularly susceptible to romanticisation at the expense of understanding it with a more diachronic, critical eye. It is important to bear in mind and question the filters we may impose upon our experience of Daitokuji due in large part to the 20th Century interpretation of Zen Buddhism.

A short piece is not sufficient to comprehensively describe Daitokuji. This is not only due to its number of treasures, or links with central characters and events in Japanese history. More importantly, it is also because it is a temple which has changed radically in character over the centuries since its humble beginnings, and which has come to embody various meanings and reflect various interpretations, a certain Western romanticisation merely being one of them.

References

Addiss, Stephen, The Art of Zen, (New York, 1989). For an examination of calligraphy and art created by Daitokuji-affiliated artists.

Kraft, Kenneth, Eloquent Zen, (Honolulu, 1992).

Levine, Gregory P. A., Daitokuji: The Visual Cultures of a Zen Monastery, (Seattle, 2005).